My title does sound too strong, but I think it reveals something about the massive use of photography by newspapers and magazines as a the ultimating tool for stating that what they are writing is true. Photos are obviously not a reflection of reality, far from it.
The examples that you can see in this article, whether it’s the MySpace cropping above or the set up Georgia pics, are blatant lies. However I think that the essence of photography is leading to permanent lies. Following are some of the factors that make
- Intentions
Which mindset are you before taking your pictures? Before going to take pictures at a wedding, in the nature for picturing birds or in a war zone, you’ll have an opinion on the topic or an idea of how you are going to shoot. This subjectivity will influence the outcome of your photography session.
For a freelance news photographer, the intentions will often be to have spectacular images that will sell good and earn him more money. - Choices
By choosing the pictures you show, you take control of what people are going to see and think about the event or subject you’ve photographed. This is obvious for newspaper pictures, but you also make a choice of the pictures you will print or keep from your holidays or any other event. - Cropping
Famous french photo-reporter Henri Cartier-Bresson always refused that his photos get cropped before being published in magazines. Unfortunately, pictures nowadays are cropped almost every time before publication, often to dramatize the situation.
The picture above is a funny example of how cropping can be used to prettify things and show only what will make you look good. - Habits / tradition
Notice how corporate photos all look alike? That’s for a good reason, people get an idea of how a corporate portrait should look like. Even if some companies try to be different from time to time, most will go the traditional way, thus not taking any risk.
Same thing happens when you go to photography school, there you get conditionned to shoot a particular event the way you are supposed to. The problem with this is that as the viewers get the habits of seeing things this particular way, it becomes very hard to change the way of shooting things or you might face rejection. - Image manipulation
This is the point where the lie is intended. It’s very commonly used in fashion magazines to make people look better, sometimes giving birth to photoshop disasters. It’s often used on war photos to make the situation look worst by adding rockets or smoke.
A recent case: staged Georgia pictures
A Georgian photographer working for Reuters, David Mdzinarishvili, recently staged photos to feed the western medias with pictures attesting that Russia committed atrocities in Georgia. You get two examples of the manipulation here, and you can also take a look at this russian analysis of two other pictures, with a guy acting in different situations.
The images shown here were published on Reuters website, some have been taken off the site afterwards. Anyway it’s not new to set up pictures to influence the public opinion, it was done in Bosnia as well.
The first picture above was captioned: ” Dead woman being carried away by the georgian soldiers from the town of Gori”. However the dead woman holds on to the nurse. Reuters changed the caption afterwards. The second one shows a screaming desperate man sitting… at the same place where the first one was shot.
These two photos, showing an elderly couple crying their dead son, answer framing needs with a moving dead body and old people acting.
Post from: Design daily news
All photographers are liars
Responses to “All photographers are liars”
May 30th, 2008 at 7:34 am
Hey..photographers like to lie a little, because they have to - but situation is not so bad as looks Ok, seriously - I like this article - interesting to look from another perspective.
May 30th, 2008 at 9:39 am
E.Mateo, Yo no soy seguro que esas imagenes son falso, me habria elegir otras peliculas para ilustrar ese articulo. Como tu puedes a ver, muchas personas son nerviosas por esta razon. Por favor no critica mi pesima gramatica espanola
May 30th, 2008 at 11:39 am
rt27, choosing those pictures was a risky choice I agree. Maybe I shouldn’t have putted them here because they attract all the attention and that people don’t seem to pay attention to anything else in the article.
Everyone knows the communist photo manipulation, so I wanted to show something different. I thought that using an example with western media propaganda would be more interesting to think on how powerful are war photography. Bus as Noam Chomsky once said: “Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines everybody is saying, or else you say something true, and it will sound like it’s from Neptune.”
You are at least right on one thing, I should have chosen examples that could not be argued. There are tons of examples of american media faking things to make a point, but apparently you don’t want to know about it.
The motivation to fake pictures is very simple, influence the public opinion to think a certain way. You probably understand that chinese or russian media do it and why, why can’t you understand that it could happen in America? Because westerners are pure and do no evil? Please, we are not in a Hollywood movie.
Here is a documentary you should watch: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5631882395226827730&ei=2fi8SPKwHYSG2QK4j4TeDA&q=manufacturing+consent
May 30th, 2008 at 5:20 pm
Hola, en la 3ª fotografía el hombre que esta de pie mirando la escena no es el mismo que esta en la 4ª sentado llorando, se parecen pero no son el mismo, el primero tiene mas barba y tiene el pelo de color mas oscuro. En la 4ª fotografia el hombre muerto todavia permanece en la escena, detras del hombre sentado en primer plano, si os fijais bien parte de su cabeza aparece por la derecha y sus pantalones por la izquierda.
Y referente a los hierros marcados con interrogantes no aparecen en la 3ª foto debido a la posicion del fotografo que en la 4ª foto se desplaza hacia atras, se arrodilla y baja la camara.
Ah, y no escribo en ingles para que no se pueda criticar mi pesima gramatica inglesa!. jajaja
May 31st, 2008 at 3:10 am
I cant easily tell that the last two photos were not stage. all you need to do is look at the footpath beside the dead body to notice that it is in fact in the same spot.
The reason why the two shots appear different from each other is because the angles are different.
May 31st, 2008 at 1:02 pm
what if your brilliant expose of staged photographs in georgia turns out to be using real photographs?
charles already told you that the last two were not staged or atleast there is no proof that they were staged.
also the third picture, where the man sitting and crying need not be staged only because - perhaps the picture was taken before the body in the second picture was carried, the man is probably a person living in the same village etc,etc - Again, using the same background does not make the situation or the photograph staged.
As for the second image - the person might have been seriously wounded and later died - the fact that reuters did not remove the picture but only changed the caption hints rather at that possiblity than being completely faked.
Also let me talk about the motivation for faking photographs - in the heat of war, their own country being occupied and violence everywhere some clever Georgian guy who has contacts/works for reuters takes some special time off - to stage photographs where there are evidence of violence everywhere. Not only does he jeopardy his own proffesional crediblity but also the credibility of his own country by these doubtful and unnecessary actions - where all the time he as a easier option to just chronicle the existing violence without any difficulty.
Rather maybe all this talk/discourse about faked photographs is a attempt to hide the brutality of the war by claiming that the damage done was “faked” by one side of the conflict. So the next time you see somebody brave enough to take pictures of war victims you need not worry or take them seriously - there is the possiblity that they are faked after all?
What a fake article, the only thing staged and lying here is the article itself and your desire for recognition and praise.
wake up, you have inferior intelligence - right now atleast -not even remotely capable of discussing how photographs are faked. Perhaps a better example would be how communist leadership propaganda photo ops were manipulated?
You can not analyze faking photographs like you talk about marketing or to your mates - i.e. in a provactive manner.
June 1st, 2008 at 1:58 am
Charles, the body seems to me to have been moved, although you are right that it is arguable. But the other pictures make a pretty good case for believing that it’s been staged, the fact that Reuters took some pictures out of their website and changed some captions does lead me to think that the serie has been staged too.
June 1st, 2008 at 6:22 am
Michelle, I apologize for the grammar mistakes, they may be the reason why you didn’t understand the point of my article.
First, the title “All photographers are liars” is inspired by Seth Godin book “All Marketers are liars”. It’s a catchy title, but it doesn’t mean that they intend to deceive people with every shot they take.
I have no doubt that almost every photojournalist wants to do good and has no cynical thoughts when working. However it does happen, much more often than you think, that photos are set up or putted in a context that will give it a different meaning, just to influence the opinion.
Also, wedding photography or war photography are more linked than you think. In both case, you have clients that want their event to be seen the way they want people to see it. Western media want to show Russia as the bad guy, and they found a photographer that gave them those pictures. Photos are always there to serve a purpose, whether it is to say “look how much we love each other and how happy we are”, “look, the russian are killing people” or “look I am very attractive, why don’t you send me some nice comments that I’ll never get in real life”.
But my point was about the essence of photography, not about the media process. Wedding is a life-long relationship, war is about history that often can’t even be explained in 500 pages books, photography is about the moment, trying to catch a piece of what happened.
The thing that you obviously don’t understand is that reality is complex, you can’t fix it on a picture. People often think that the pictures they see are reality because what they see is real people. This is where the concept of photography becomes a lie, in the perception that people have of what they are being shown.
May 30th, 2008 at 12:49 am
[…] Thanks to Design Daily News […]